Contents
Sébastien Saliques has been a hospital pharmacist for more than ten years. From that seat, he has watched the same scene again and again: a patient arrives, and a prescription, a lab result, an imaging report or a hospital letter is missing. Medical information, as he puts it, is “everywhere and nowhere at once”.
For the past few years, he has been building HealthGuard, a project to give patients full ownership of their medical documents while making professionals’ work easier. He presented it on MyTwin Inside in July 2026, and MyTwin plans to build its technology into the records patients create in the MyTwin app. HealthGuard is at alpha stage and not yet available.
The cost of information that isn’t there
The problem is well documented. When patients read their clinical notes, one in five reports finding a mistake, and 42% of them consider it serious, according to a US study of more than 22,000 patients. At hospital admission, errors in medication histories occur in up to 67% of cases. After discharge, the hospital summary is available at the first follow-up visit in only 12% to 34% of cases. And according to the World Health Organization, medication discrepancies affect almost every patient who moves across transitions of care.
Public tools exist. In France, every citizen has a Mon espace santé account and a shared medical record. But, Sébastien Saliques explains, few people use them before they have a medical history, hospital data often don’t reach them, and many professionals, lacking card readers in consultation rooms, fall back on email.
Share access, not documents
HealthGuard’s idea fits in one sentence, the one its founder uses: “we no longer share a document, we share access to a document”. A document sent by email is a copy: nobody can say who still has it, and it can’t be taken back. With HealthGuard, the patient keeps their documents in one place and grants access instead, to a person, a team or an institution, for part of their record and for a set time, from an hour to a year. Every access is traced, and the patient can revoke it at any time.
- A copy is sent by email.
- Nobody can say who still has it.
- It can’t be taken back.
- The patient grants access to a person, a team or an institution.
- For part of the record, and for a set time.
- Every access is traced, and can be revoked at any time.
Under the hood, according to the project:
- documents are encrypted before being stored;
- storage is decentralised, on the IPFS network, rather than on a single server;
- a blockchain records only the access permissions and their history, never a medical document.
The founder’s argument is security by design: with no central store of documents, there is no single place to attack, and access rules don’t depend on trusting one institution.
Where HealthGuard stands
HealthGuard is an alpha. It is not available to patients yet. Before it is, it will have to show how it meets the rules that govern health data, from the GDPR to certified health data hosting in France.
The context is moving its way. The European Health Data Space regulation, in force since March 2025, gives patients fast and free access to their own electronic health data across the European Union.
Why it matters for MyTwin
Bringing a patient’s medical documents together in one place is at the heart of MyTwin. Kevin’s story shows what medical reports a patient can’t make sense of cost in worry and waiting, and our guide to keeping a personal health record explains how to organise and share one safely. HealthGuard’s access model would let the records created in MyTwin be shared this way, possibly without patients even noticing the technology underneath.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use HealthGuard today?
No. HealthGuard is an alpha-stage project and is not yet available to patients.
Are medical documents stored on a blockchain?
No. According to HealthGuard, the blockchain only records access permissions and their history. The documents themselves are encrypted and stored on decentralised storage.
Sources
Sources · 6
- 01Bell S.K. et al., 2020, “Frequency and types of patient-reported errors in electronic health record ambulatory care notes”, JAMA Network Open.
- 02Tam V.C. et al., 2005, “Frequency, type and clinical importance of medication history errors at admission to hospital: a systematic review”, CMAJ.
- 03Kripalani S. et al., 2007, “Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians”, JAMA.
- 04World Health Organization, 2019, “Medication safety in transitions of care”.
- 05European Commission, “European Health Data Space Regulation (EHDS)”.
- 06HealthGuard, project website.
This news is provided for information only. The technologies it describes are at research or pilot stage, and none of them replaces advice, diagnosis or treatment from a healthcare professional.
